Orhan Awatramani — aka Orry — was questioned by the Anti-Narcotics Cell (ANC) of Mumbai Police in connection with a ₹252-crore mephedrone bust. He denied any drug links, refused to cooperate, and soon after posted a defiant party video flipping the middle finger — triggering fresh outrage and speculation.
Key Takeaways
- Orry questioned for 7.5 hours — Mumbai Police’s ANC grilled him over alleged links to a major drug supply network that surfaced after a drug-factory bust.
- He denied involvement and refused cooperation — He said he only attends parties to click photos with celebrities; denied knowing about drugs or key accused.
- Viral middle-finger video added fuel — Mere hours after interrogation, Orry posted a party video with a crude gesture and caption “Just let me live,” seen by many as flaunting defiance.
- Investigation still wide open — more names may emerge — Police are examining his financials, travel history; they may summon him again as probe expands beyond the initial bust.
What’s Going On: The Case at a Glance
Background — Why Orry’s Name Surfaced
- In March 2024, police raided a drug-manufacturing facility in Sangli district and seized 126.14 kg of mephedrone (MD), valued at ~₹252 crore.
- Investigation of the network led to the arrest and deportation from Dubai of alleged trafficker Mohammad Salim Mohammad Suhail Shaikh (also known as “Lavish”). During interrogation, Shaikh claimed he organised rave parties in India and abroad attended by many — including Orry.
- Citing this claim, police summoned Orry in November 2025 for questioning at the ANC’s Ghatkopar unit.
What Happened During Questioning
- On November 26, 2025, Orry appeared before the ANC around 1:30 PM, accompanied by his lawyer. He was interrogated for about 7.5 hours.
- He denied all ties to drugs or the accused. Said he goes to parties only to click photos with celebrities. Claimed he doesn’t recall attending any drug-fueled events.
- Police say he did not cooperate fully. They flagged discrepancies in his statements and are cross-checking his financial records, foreign travels, and communication logs with those of accused.
Aftermath: Video, Public Reaction & Legal Outlook
The Middle-Finger Video
- Just hours after being questioned, Orry posted a video on Instagram: dancing, partying, showing a middle finger, captioned “Just let me live.”
- The video sparked outrage. Many saw it as flaunting defiance — an insult to the investigation. Some supporters considered it a bid to show innocence by appearing carefree. The divide in public sentiment is stark.
What This Means for the Investigation
- Investigators likely view the video as potentially damaging — it may be used to argue a lack of seriousness or uncooperativeness.
- Police haven’t ruled out calling him back for further questioning — especially if more evidence or witness statements surface.
- Beyond Orry, other personalities named by the accused might be summoned — so far the case seems to be widening.
What This Signals — Bigger Picture & Risks
Risk for Influencers & High-Profile Party-Goers
If the allegations hold, this case marks a warning: presence at parties — even as a social media influencer or “party-chaser” — may draw serious legal scrutiny. The mere fact of attendance can trigger questioning. It’s a shift: social clout is no longer a shield.
Reputation Damage & Business Fallout
The viral video might have undermined public goodwill. For influencers, reputation is currency. Being linked to a ₹252-crore drug scandal and showing defiance publicly — that can scare away brands, collaborations, and trust.
Legal Precedent & Policing Strategy
Authorities appear willing to dig deep — financing trails, travel logs, party guest lists. This may set a precedent: high-profile socialites or nightlife regulars could face stronger scrutiny in similar investigations.
FAQ
Not yet. As of now, he’s only been questioned by the ANC. Charges would depend on further evidence linking him to the supply chain or trafficking.
It doesn’t amount to proof of guilt — but investigators may use it to question his attitude, seriousness, or to argue that he was uncooperative or dismissive during questioning.
Yes. The police already named several other individuals during the trafficker’s interrogation. If evidence or witness testimony supports those claims, summons could broaden.
